CardioSenseSystem Compared Study Regarding Efficacy and Safety in the Monitoring of ECG (NCT03610529) | Clinical Trial Compass
UnknownNot Applicable
CardioSenseSystem Compared Study Regarding Efficacy and Safety in the Monitoring of ECG
Sweden60 participantsStarted 2020-09
Plain-language summary
This is a prospective, controlled, comparative clinical trial of a new ECG monitoring system CardioSenseSystem prior CE marking. The aim of the study is to demonstrate that the CardioSenseSystem's cable-free ECG monitoring system (investigational device) is equivalent or better than traditional and accepted industry standard for cable-based ECG monitoring system (control device). In this study accepted industry standard is Philips Intellivue. In order to investigate this, the study will measure ECG monitoring interruptions, management time and alarm performance. The study population will consist of sixty (60) adult subjects requiring ECG and that are fulfilling the eligibility criteria for study participation. The subjects will be using both the investigational device and the control device simultaneous for measuring data loss, management time and alarm function up to 24 hours.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Male or female at least 18 years old.
. Patient hospitalized at the investigational site and in need of ECG monitoring.
. Patient with expected alarms during the 24 hours ECG monitoring.
. Patient who has been informed of the clinical trials purpose, limitations and relevance, and who has voluntarily agreed to participation in the clinical trial by signing the informed consent form.
Exclusion criteria
. Patient with burns.
. Patient with known allergy or sensitivity to any of the compositions in CardioPatch.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.