UnknownNot Applicable

Accuracy of 3DPrinted Windowed Bracket- Positioning Guide Compared To Thermoformed Indirect Bonding Tray

132 participantsStarted 2018-09

Plain-language summary

this study was aimed to evaluate of accuracy of 3DPrinted windowed Bracket- Positioning Guide in compare to Thermoformed Transfer Tray For Orthodontic Indirect Bonding

Who can participate

Age range13 Years – 25 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion criteria

✓. Age: above 13 years.
✓. Complete set of permanent teeth including second molar.
✓. No sex predilection.
✓. Class I Mild to moderate crowding (4-6 mm).

Exclusion criteria

✕. Surface enamel defect that compromise bonding
✕. No or poor patient's compliance.
✕. Psychological problems.
✕. Pathology at the site of intervention.
✕. Insufficient crown height that contradicts bonding of brackets.
✕. Labial and buccal Restorations.
✕. Poor oral hygiene.
✕. Severely rotated teeth

What they're measuring

accuracy of 3D printed transfer tray with windows& conventional thermoformed transfer tray

Timeframe: immediate

Trial details

NCT IDNCT03585881

SponsorCairo University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2018-11

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Inaccurate Transfer and Bond Failure of Conventional Indirect Bonding Tray trials