Evaluation of Safety and Feasibility of EUS-guided RFA for Solid Pancreatic Neoplasms (NCT03435770) | Clinical Trial Compass
UnknownNot Applicable
Evaluation of Safety and Feasibility of EUS-guided RFA for Solid Pancreatic Neoplasms
Singapore10 participantsStarted 2018-03-01
Plain-language summary
This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of new ablation catheter developed by MEDICAL TAEWOONG for the treatment of pancreatic neoplasm (pancreatic adenocarcinoma or neuroendocrine tumour). The ablation is performed using EUSRA needle and radio frequency waves under ultrasound imaging. The subject who will be recruited into this study are patients who are deemed as non-surgical candidates.
Who can participate
Age range
21 Years – 99 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Age 21 years-old or above
* Suffering from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour or pancreatic ductal carcinoma that was confirmed by fine needle aspiration cytology
* Unsuitable for surgery, due to one (or more) of the following items:
* ASA score \>/= III
* An alternative advanced malignancy
* Unsuitable for surgery upon expert's opinion for any other reason
* Individuals who are not keen for surgical resection
* Eligible for endoscopic intervention
* Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
* Coagulopathy (international normalized ratio \>1.5, partial thromboplastin time greater than twice that of control), platelet count \<50,000x103/uL
* Pregnancy
* Patients with a poor mental condition or mental retardation, unable to understand the nature and possible consequences of the study
* Patients unwilling to undergo follow-up assessments
* Patients with liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension and/or gastric varices.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
To measure the technical success of EUS-guided RFA
Timeframe: 18 months
2
To measure side effects and adverse event of EUS-guided RFA