In the present study the investigators aim to examine the presence of bacteria in the disc and Modic Changes (MCs) (bone). A prospective study with 1-year follow-up of two patient populations undergoing elective spinal surgery (spinal fusion or disc herniation surgery) will be conducted. Patients previously operated on at index level will also be included, and evaluated as sub-groups. The following tissues are collected: dermis, sub-fascial tissue, nucleus pulposus, annulus fibrosus, and endplates. Endplate and annular biopsies are only performed in patients undergoing fusion surgery. In addition, air samples from the operating theatre during surgery are collected as negative controls. All tissue samples undergoing culturing should be processed within 4 hours of sampling. The time for sampling and culture processing is noted for each sample. Details are available in a published Method article. For each tissue sample, bacterial growth is recorded and the bacteria are identified at species level. Initially, the microbiologist grades the plates as "no growth", "possible contamination", and "significant growth". "Possible contamination" means that the bacteria may be derived from the environment and could have been introduced at any step from the sample is taken to the analyses in the laboratory. Therefore, we have included negative controls in each step. The investigators will perform direct 16S rDNA amplicon nanopore sequencing on all frozen tissue samples and air samples. Nanopore sequence reads are searched against a 16S rDNA database and the read counts per bacterium are evaluated for each sequencing batch containing 96 samples with regard to the included negative and positive controls. Other broad metagenomic methods may be considered, e.g. Illumina sequencing. Since Cutibacterium acnes is considered the main pathogen in this setting, the investigators will also use a specific PCR on all samples. To validate any positive findings, negative DNA extraction control and negative PCR control will be included in each run. Since C. acnes DNA is known to be highly prevalent within the air and environment generally, the negative controls may give a late positive signal due to environmental contamination. To reach a conclusion on either positive or negative finding for the C. acnes PCR, we will use a cutoff of 37 cycle threshold (Ct) values which is the lowest Ct value for any negative controls. In addition, the investigators will use whole genome sequencing on C. acnes isolates for phylogenetic analyses to compare isolates found in different samples from the same patient. In cases of a culture-negative but 16S rDNA nanopore-positive biopsy, the sample is classified as "no growth" when we find the same bacterial species in the air control sample as in the biopsy. After the study was designed and the method article was prepared, nanopore sequencing technology became available and was incorporated into the present analysis. Although not part of the original protocol, 16S rDNA nanopore sequencing was applied to all samples to complement the diagnostic approach. The results derived from 16S rDNA nanopore sequencing will be included as part of prespecified sensitivity analyses to evaluate the robustness of the main finding. These analyses allow assessment of whether the inclusion of sequencing-based detection influences the overall estimates and conclusions, while maintaining the original study design. Based on cultivation alone, samples will be graded as "significant growth", "possible contamination" or "no growth". Before unblinding, in preparation for the sensitivity analyses, all samples of nucleus and annulus will be classified into a final categorization of "significant growth", "possible significant growth", "nanopore positive" or "no growth" based on cultivation and PCR (see Table 1 under Study Documents "Final categorization of bacterial growth and PCR-based methods for each tissue sample"). The microbiologists, pathologist, statistician and clinicians are blinded until end of study, April 22th 2026. Blood-samples are collected to characterize gene expression patterns and related markers.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Microbiological analysis (aerob, anaerob cultivation)
Timeframe: During surgery
Histopathology and PCR
Timeframe: During surgery
Gene expression profiling
Timeframe: During surgery