The timing of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the context of severe acute kidney injury (AKI) is one the most debated issues in critical care medicine. The Artificial Kidney Initiation in Kidney Injury (AKIKI) was the first large prospective multicenter randomized trial published on this topic. This study (published in the New England Journal of Medicine, July 2017) showed no significant difference between an early and delayed RRT initiation strategy in term of mortality. Nearly 50% of patients escaped RRT in the delayed strategy and this strategy was associated with less catheter-related infections and faster renal function recovery. Two (serum urea concentration \>40 mmol/l and oliguria/anuria for more than 72 hours) of the 5 criteria which mandated RRT in the delayed strategy are still open to debate since they have never been shown to put patient at danger. To go further into our investigation of RRT criteria, the investigators designed a study that would compare the "delayed strategy" used in AKIKI that can now be considered as "standard" with another in which RRT is delayed for a longer period in the absence of a life-threatening complication (such as hyperkalemia or severe overload pulmonary edema).
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
number of RRT-free days
Timeframe: Day 28 after randomization