Prevalence of Antimicrobial-resistant Pathogens in Patients Admitted for UTIs (NCT03346603) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Prevalence of Antimicrobial-resistant Pathogens in Patients Admitted for UTIs
United States801 participantsStarted 2018-02-08
Plain-language summary
Between 2013-2014, our study network of U.S. emergency departments, EMERGEncy ID NET, found that the rate of fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli was 11.7% among all patients, 6.3% in uncomplicated and 19.9% in complicated. ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae were found in 7.7% of all cases, 2.6% in uncomplicated and 12.2% in complicated. More recently, Enterobactericeae and gram-negative non fermenting bacteria have started to show resistance to carbapenems (CREs and CR-NF). Patients hospitalized with UTI and urosepsis represent a higher risk population for infections due to multi-drug resistant bacteria and experience serious adverse outcomes, including death. EMERGEncy ID NET will conduct a study to determine the prevalence of ESBL-producing, CREs and CR-NFs among this high risk population of patients admitted for UTI from U.S. emergency departments.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Age greater than or equal to 18 years;
. Admitted to the hospital through the ED;
. Primary reason for admission is treatment of UTI with or without sepsis (i.e., ED diagnosis of UTI and/or sepsis); and
. Provide verbal or written consent to participate in the study or if patient is unable to provide consent (e.g., altered mental status), consent obtained from a legal authorized representative.
Exclusion criteria
. they are unable to provide a urine specimen for culture; or
. their urine culture yields no growth or is contaminated (see definition of positive urine culture below). Note: If participant's urine culture is contaminated but their blood culture is positive for a uropathogen, they will not be excluded.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae
Timeframe: 2 years
2
Prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)
Timeframe: 2 years
3
Prevalence of carbapenem-resistant non fermenting gram negative bacteria
Timeframe: 2 years
Trial details
NCT IDNCT03346603
SponsorOlive View-UCLA Education & Research Institute