CompletedNot Applicable

Comparison of Treatment Effects of PowerScope2 and Forsus Using CBCT

India42 participantsStarted 2016-08-16

Plain-language summary

The main objective of this prospective, controlled clinical study is: 1. To compare the treatment effects of PowerScope2 and Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in patients with Class II divison1 malocclusion. 2. To compare the treatment effects of PowerScope2 and Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device with the control group. The null hypothesis for this study is that Forsus and PowerScope2 are equally effective in the treatment of ClassII div1 malocclusion.

Who can participate

Age range12 Years – 17 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients in active growth period * Skeletal Class II malocclusion * Normal or mildly prognathic maxilla * Retrognathic mandible. * Increased overjet, not less than 5 mm. * Horizontal to average growth pattern * Positive pretreatment visual treatment objective (VTO). * Minimum crowding in dental arches. * Treatment completed without any permanent teeth extracted (excluding third molars). Exclusion Criteria:• Subjects with a history of orthodontic treatment * Anterior open bite * Severe proclination and crowding of anterior teeth * Any systemic disease affecting bone and generalgrowth * Vertical growth pattern * Patient who fails to follow up or undergo complete treatment

What they're measuring

mandibular length

Timeframe: 20 months

oropharyngeal volume

Timeframe: 20 months

condylar changes

Timeframe: 20 months

patient experiences

Timeframe: 20 months

pancherz analysis

Timeframe: 20 months

soft tissue changes

Timeframe: 20 months

Trial details

NCT IDNCT03296644

SponsorPostgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2018-04

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Class II Division 1 Malocclusion trials