Efficacy & Safety Study of Bilateral IVT Injection of GS010 in LHON Subjects Due to the ND4 Mutat… (NCT03293524) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedPhase 3
Efficacy & Safety Study of Bilateral IVT Injection of GS010 in LHON Subjects Due to the ND4 Mutation for up to 1 Year
United States, Belgium, France98 participantsStarted 2018-03-12
Plain-language summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of GS010 gene therapy - (lenadogene nolparvovec) in subjects with LHON due to the G11778A ND4 mitochondrial mutation with a vision loss up to one year.
Who can participate
Age range
15 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Main Selection Criteria:
* Age 15 years or older on the date of signed informed consent.
* Clinically manifested vision loss due to ND4 LHON, to any extent, in at least one eye.
* Vision loss duration of ≤ 365 days (i.e. ≤ 1 year) in each affected eye at Inclusion Visit (Visit 2).
Main Non-Selection Criteria:
* Contraindication to intravitreal injection in any eye.
* Subjects refusing to discontinue idebenone.
* Previous vitrectomy in either eye.
* Narrow angle in any eye contra-indicating pupillary dilation.
* Presence of known/documented mutations, other than the G11778A ND4 LHON-causing mutation, which are known to cause pathology of the optic nerve, retina or afferent visual system.
* History of recurrent uveitis (idiopathic or immune-related) or active ocular inflammation.
Main Inclusion Criteria:
* Vision loss duration of ≤ 365 days (i.e. ≤ 1 year) in each affected eye at Inclusion Visit (Visit 2).
* Each eye of the subject must maintain at least Hand Motion (HM) visual acuity, as defined by the study's SOP for visual acuity testing.
* Documented results of genotyping showing the presence of the G11778A mutation in the ND4 gene and the absence of the other primary LHON-associated mutations (ND1 or ND6) in the subject's mitochondrial DNA.
Main Exclusion Criteria:
* Light Perception (LP) or No Light Perception (NLP) visual acuity in any eye, as defined by the study's standard operating procedure (SOP) for visual acuity testing.
* Presence of active infectious conju…
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Change From Baseline of the Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Reported With Log of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) at 1.5 Years Post-treatment, in the Second Affected/Not-yet Affected Eyes
Timeframe: at 1.5 years post-treatment, in the second-affected/not-yet affected eyes