Variability of Infant LP Insertion Site Based On Procedural Experience (NCT02949869) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Variability of Infant LP Insertion Site Based On Procedural Experience
United States110 participantsStarted 2016-11
Plain-language summary
The reported rate of unsuccessful traditional LP in children (defined as the inability to obtain cerebrospinal fluid or obtaining a traumatic puncture) is as high as 50%. Many factors affect LP success including provider experience. CSF is obtained by puncturing the subarachnoid space (traditionally at the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspinous process space), and many have hypothesized that the width of this space may predict success. Anecdotally, trainees and those with less experience, tend to perform the LP too low (caudally), where the subarachnoid space tapers, or too laterally (off the midline) resulting in higher failure rates. The investigators seek to determine if planned LP insertion sites vary between training and attendings, and if so, could the decreased success be explained by smaller subarachnoid spaces.
Who can participate
Age range
12 Months
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Less than or equal to 12 months of age
. Availability of a study sonographer to perform bedside ultrasound
Exclusion criteria
. Prior history of LP in preceding 72 hours
. Known spinal cord abnormality (i.e., tethered cord, spina bifida)
. Clinically unstable patients (acuity level 1)
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Proportion of Trainee & Attending LP Insertion Sites that are the same