Lithium Disilicate Glass-ceramic Versus Hybrid Ceramic Superstructure Materials on Implant Stability (NCT02931903) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Lithium Disilicate Glass-ceramic Versus Hybrid Ceramic Superstructure Materials on Implant Stability
20 participantsStarted 2017-01
Plain-language summary
The aim of this study is to assess the effect of the newly introduced (hybrid dental ceramic) superstructure materials, Vita Enamic versus IPS Emax on implant stability, patient satisfaction and crestal bone loss.
Who can participate
Age range18 Years – 50 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients \> 18 yrs. Patients with missing teeth in the maxillary premolar region. Absence of any pathological condition in the recipient site.
Stabilization phase will be performed including:
* Scaling
* Debridement.
* Elimination of all carious cavities and root canal treatment if needed.
* Elimination of over-hanging restoration. Systemic condition of the subjects was evaluated according to dental modification of the Cornell medical index (Kerr and Millard 1966).
Patients who are cooperative, motivated, and hygiene conscious. Patients should have adequate ridge width (\>5mm).
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients unable to undergo minor surgical procedure. Patients with history of drug abuse or metabolic drugs. Patients with history of psychiatric disorder. Patients with insufficient bone. Patients with insufficient vertical inter-arch space, upon centric occlusion, to accommodate the available restorative components.
Patients with any systemic condition that may contraindicate implant therapy. Patients that may have any habits that may jeopardize the osseo-integration process, such as heavy smoking and alcoholism.
Patients with para-functional habits that produce overload on the implant such as bruxism and clenching.