Rationale: Application of long-term non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (CHRF) has recently been shown to improve survival and quality of life when applied with sufficiently high inspiratory pressures and adequate backup breathing frequencies (so called high-intensity NIV). However, for a broader implementation of this therapy in a potentially large group of patients, important issues have to be solved. First, the initiation of high-intensity NIV, currently performed in the hospital, is often time-consuming, expensive and inconvenient for patients. Secondly, although clinicians recognise that not all patients benefit, it is not known which factors predict a positive response. Objectives: 1. To investigate whether home initiation of chronic NIV in stable COPD patients with CHRF is non-inferior to inpatient initiation. 2. To investigate predictors of a favourable response to chronic NIV in COPD patients with CHRF. Study design: The study is 1:1 two-arm parallel group randomised controlled trial comparing the usual inpatient NIV initiation to home initiation. Study population: Seventy-two COPD patients with a NIV indication (COPD GOLD stage III or IV; partial arterial carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO2) \> 6.0 kPa in stable condition, i.e. no COPD exacerbation for 4 weeks and a pH \> 7.35), a sufficient social network at home, without severe cardiac comorbidities, will be included. Intervention: Home initiation of NIV will be compared with standard in-hospital initiation. NIV at home will be titrated by a specialised nurse of our home mechanical ventilation centre (HMV) on transcutaneously measured gas exchange and respiratory electromyography and will be adjusted with the use of telemedicine. Main study parameters/endpoints: 1. To investigate non-inferiority of home initiation, the change in arterial carbon dioxide pressure after 3 months treatment will be the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes are safety, change in lung function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and costs. 2. To investigate predictors of a favourable response, patient demographics, and baseline data on lung function as well as measures of respiratory muscle activity, arterial blood gases, comorbidities, inflammatory blood markers and anxiety and depressions scores will be collected of all patients.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Change in daytime PaCO2
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 months