A Comparative Study of Two Endoscopic Operations for Lacrimal Duct Obstruction (NCT02636257) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedPhase 1/2
A Comparative Study of Two Endoscopic Operations for Lacrimal Duct Obstruction
China50 participantsStarted 2015-07
Plain-language summary
To compare the clinical effects between the silicone nasolacrimal intubation under nasoendoscopy and dacryocystorhinostomy on patients with lacrimal duct obstruction.
Who can participate
Age range18 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Clinical diagnosis of Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction based on a clinical of epiphora and purulent secretion, another punctiform orifices with reflux in subsequent flushing in lacrimal passage irrigation;
* Must be able to withstand surgery
* At least 18 years old
* NO lacrimal tumor and acute inflammation
* Nasolacrimal duct obstruction in digital subtraction dacryocystography
* A sufficient level of education to understand study procedures and be able to communicate with site personnel and adhere to the follow-up;
* Accepted informed consent verbally and in writing
Exclusion Criteria:
* The Poor Health
* Be allergic to anesthetics
* Lacrimal duct abnormalities
* Lacrimal tumor and acute inflammation
* Children
* The same Surgery failure before
Exit Criteria
* Postoperative infection and persistent inflammation
* Operation failure.
What they're measuring
1
Epiphora Improvement
Timeframe: one-year follow-up
2
Lacrimal Passage Irrigation
Timeframe: one-year follow-up
Trial details
NCT IDNCT02636257
SponsorThird Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University