Assessment of long-term safety and efficacy of oral lacosamide (LCM) as an adjunctive therapy for uncontrolled primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) in subjects \>= 4 years of age with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE). This study will enroll subjects from the LCM SP0982 \[NCT02408523\] study.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Number of Study Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Over the Duration of the Treatment Period
Timeframe: From Visit 1 (Week 0) to End of Treatment Period (up to approximately 5 years)
Number of Study Participants Withdrawn Due to TEAEs
Timeframe: From Visit 1 (Week 0) to End of Treatment Period (up to approximately 5 years)
Number of Study Participants With New Appearance of Absence and/or Myoclonic Seizures During the Treatment Period
Timeframe: From Visit 1 (Week 0) to End of Treatment Period (up to approximately 5 years)
Number of Study Participants With an Increase of up to 25% in Days With Absence Seizures Per 28 Days During the Treatment Period as Compared to the Prospective Baseline (of Study SP0982)
Timeframe: From Visit 1 (Week 0) to End of Treatment Period (up to approximately 5 years), compared to the Prospective SP0982 Baseline Period
Number of Study Participants With an Increase of Greater Than (>)25% to 50% in Days With Absence Seizures Per 28 Days During the Treatment Period as Compared to the Prospective Baseline (of Study SP0982)
Timeframe: From Visit 1 (Week 0) to End of Treatment Period (up to approximately 5 years), compared to the Prospective SP0982 Baseline Period
Number of Study Participants With an Increase of >50% to 75% in Days With Absence Seizures Per 28 Days During the Treatment Period as Compared to the Prospective Baseline (of Study SP0982)
Timeframe: From Visit 1 (Week 0) to End of Treatment Period (up to approximately 5 years), compared to the Prospective SP0982 Baseline Period
Number of Study Participants With an Increase of >75% in Days With Absence Seizures Per 28 Days During the Treatment Period as Compared to the Prospective Baseline (of Study SP0982)
Timeframe: From Visit 1 (Week 0) to End of Treatment Period (up to approximately 5 years), compared to the Prospective SP0982 Baseline Period
Number of Study Participants With an Increase of up to 25% in Days With Myoclonic Seizures Per 28 Days During the Treatment Period as Compared to the Prospective Baseline (of Study SP0982)
Timeframe: From Visit 1 (Week 0) to End of Treatment Period (up to approximately 5 years), compared to the Prospective SP0982 Baseline Period
Number of Study Participants With an Increase of >25% to 50% in Days With Myoclonic Seizures Per 28 Days During the Treatment Period as Compared to the Prospective Baseline (of Study SP0982)
Timeframe: From Visit 1 (Week 0) to End of Treatment Period (up to approximately 5 years), compared to the Prospective SP0982 Baseline Period
Number of Study Participants With an Increase of >50% to 75% in Days With Myoclonic Seizures Per 28 Days During the Treatment Period as Compared to the Prospective Baseline (of Study SP0982)
Timeframe: From Visit 1 (Week 0) to End of Treatment Period (up to approximately 5 years), compared to the Prospective SP0982 Baseline Period
Number of Study Participants With an Increase of >75% in Days With Myoclonic Seizures Per 28 Days During the Treatment Period as Compared to the Prospective Baseline (of Study SP0982)
Timeframe: From Visit 1 (Week 0) to End of Treatment Period (up to approximately 5 years), compared to the Prospective SP0982 Baseline Period
Percentage of Study Participants With at Least 50% Worsening in Days With Absence Seizures
Timeframe: From Visit 1 (Week 0) to End of Treatment Period (up to approximately 5 years)
Percentage of Study Participants With at Least 50% Worsening in Days With Myoclonic Seizures
Timeframe: From Visit 1 (Week 0) to End of Treatment Period (up to approximately 5 years)