Evaluation of Vitamin K Supplementation for Calcific Uremic Arteriolopathy (NCT02278692) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Evaluation of Vitamin K Supplementation for Calcific Uremic Arteriolopathy
United States26 participantsStarted 2015-03
Plain-language summary
Calcific uremic arteriolopathy a.k.a. calciphylaxis is a vascular calcification disorder seen in dialysis patients. Calcific uremic arteriolopathy has 60-80% one-year mortality and significant morbidity associated with non-healing and extremely painful skin lesions. At present, there is no effective treatment for calcific uremic arteriolopathy.
Vitamin K is an important vitamin for inhibiting vascular calcification. It is known to increase the circulating levels of carboxylated Matrix Gla Protein, a potent inhibitor of vascular calcification. However, the effects of vitamin K supplementation in patients with calcific uremic arteriolopathy are unknown.
The purpose of this study is to conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial to examine the effects of oral vitamin K supplementation on circulating levels of anti-calcification factor (carboxylated Matrix Gla Protein) and clinical outcomes in patients with calcific uremic arteriolopathy.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Calcific uremic arteriolopathy (a.k.a. calciphylaxis)
Exclusion Criteria:
* Warfarin discontinuation contra-indicated (e.g. mechanical heart valve)
* Prior allergic reaction to vitamin K
* Prior history of venous thromboembolism\*
* Pregnancy and lactation
(\*Patients with prior history of thrombosis who are treated with non-warfarin anticoagulant agents (e.g. apixaban, enoxaparin, etc) will be considered for inclusion)
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Change from baseline in circulating MGP level at 12 weeks