Pregnant women are at particular risk during the imminent H1N1v influenza pandemic. The new H1N1v virus requires urgent political and medical decisions on vaccination strategies in order to minimize severe disease and death from this pandemic. However, there is a lack of evidence to build such decisions upon. A vaccine will be provided in the fourth quarter of 2009, but there is little knowledge on the immunogenicity. Particularly its clinical effectiveness and duration of immunity in pregnant women and their newborn infants is unknown. Therefore, it will be important to study the optimal vaccination regimens with respect to dosing and use of adjuvant to decide future health policies on vaccination of pregnant women. We have a unique possibility to study these aspects of H1N1v infection in pregnant women in our ongoing unselected, prospective, birth-cohort study recruiting 800 pregnant mothers between Q1- 2009 and Q4-2010. Pregnant women from East-Denmark are being enrolled during the 2nd trimester and their infant will undergo a close clinical follow-up. The H1N1v pandemic is expected to reach Denmark Q4-2009. The timing of this enrollment and the imminent pandemic allows for an "experiment of nature" whereby the first half of the mothers completes pregnancy before the H1N1v pandemic. The other half of this cohort will be pregnant while H1N1v is prevalent in the community and will require H1N1v vaccination. The aim of this randomized, controlled, trial is to compare and evaluate the dose-related immune protection conferred by vaccine and adjuvant (Novartis vaccine Focetria) in pregnant women and non-pregnant women. In addition the protocol will assess the passive immunity conferred to the newborn from these vaccine regimes. The study will provide evidence-based guidance for health policies on vaccination for the population of pregnant women during future H1N1v pandemics.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Day 22/Day 1, and at all the other relevant time points to assess persistence/Day 1 geometric mean ratio (GMR) of HI
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 22
Geometric mean HI titer (GMT) on Day 1, Day 22, and at all the other relevant time points to assess persistence.
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 22
Percentage of subjects achieving a seroconversion or a significant increase (defined as: HI ≥1:40 for subjects negative at baseline [<1:10]; a minimum 4-fold increase in HI titer for subjects positive at baseline [HI≥1:10])
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 22
Percentage of subjects with a HI titer ≥1:40 (i.e. seroprotection) on Day 1, Day 22, and at all the other relevant time points to assess persistence
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 22