Study to Compare Survival for ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ Implants Following Immediate… (NCT00710944) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Study to Compare Survival for ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ Implants Following Immediate Loading in Extraction Sockets Versus Immediate Loading in Healed Ridges
United States, Belgium, Germany132 participantsStarted 2005-04
Plain-language summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate survival for ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ implants following immediate loading in extraction sockets versus immediate loading in healed ridges. Patients in need of single standing implants replacing teeth in the maxilla within zone 15-25 will be included and followed for 5 years. Primary objective is implant survival rate at 12 months.
Who can participate
Age range18 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Provision of written informed consent
* 18 years of age and over
* A minimum of 20 stable intra occlusal contacts after planned restoration
* In need of single standing implants replacing missing / extracted / avulsed teeth in the maxilla within zone 15 to 25
Exclusion Criteria:
* Untreated rampant caries and uncontrolled periodontal disease
* Use of smoking tobacco at time of inclusion
* History of pre-surgical bone augmentation, within 4 months, in the planned implant area
* History of extraction without augmentation, within 3 months in the planned implant area
* Absence of opposing dentition
* Absence of adjacent (mesial and/or distal) natural tooth
* Uncontrolled diabetes
* Known pregnancy at time of inclusion
* Present alcohol or drug abuse
* Any systemic or local disease or condition that would compromise post-operative healing and/or osseointegration
* Need for systemic corticosteroids or any other medication that would compromise post-operative healing and/or osseointegration
* Unable or unwilling to return for follow-up visits for a period of 5 years
* Unrealistic esthetical demands
* Unlikely to be able to comply with study procedures according to Investigators judgment
* Already included in this study