The objective of the study is to compare the safety of innohep® and Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) in terms of clinically relevant bleedings in elderly patients with impaired renal function for initial treatment of acute Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT).
The primary response criterion is the percentage of patients with clinically relevant bleeding events prior to day 90 +/- 5.
Who can participate
Age range
70 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Patients with a symptomatic and objectively confirmed Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) (lower limb deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolus (PE)) with mandatory presences of objectively confirmed and treatment requiring DVT, i.e. symptomatic and objectively confirmed distal DVT or objectively confirmed, symptomatic or asymptomatic proximal DVT (confirmation of DVT should be performed by ultrasonography or venography within 48 hous prior to randomisation)
* Patients with an indication for DVT treatment with SC Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) or Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) followed by Oral Anticoagulant (OAC) for at least 90 days
* Hospitalized patients who, during SC anticoagulant treatment, will be followed, as specified in the protocol, on a daily basis either in the hospital or in an out-patient setting
* Patients at or above 75 years with a creatinine clearance less than or equal to 60 mL/min calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula
* Patients at or above 70 years with a creatinine clearance less than or equal to 30 mL/min calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula
Exclusion Criteria:
* Patients receiving high dose (i.e. equivalent to a dose recommended for treatment of DVT) of UFH or LMWH or thrombolytic agents within the last 4 weeks except for UFH/LMWH during the last 36 hours prior to randomisation
* Patients on oral anticoagulant treatment (vitamin K-antagonists) at or within last 1 week prior to randomisation
* P…
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Number of Patients With Clinically Relevant Bleeding Events